The fourth issue I will be covering surrounding the ineligibility of Barack Obama’s presidency will be that of the claims surrounding the fake Long Form Birth Certificate (LFBC). This is a contentious issue out there in the media, however facts don’t lie and I will illustrate this further. The manner in which I will attack this subject is by splitting the issue into two. The first of my arguments will be based on the actual scanned copy of the LFBC and the second group of arguments will be based on the actual information therein contained.
There are certain characteristics that a computer can perform which cannot be duplicated manually. The one is digital while the other is analog, of which the LFBC is supposed to be created using the analog version, a typewriter. When analyzing the LFBC there are many smoking guns which without a doubt prove it as a forgery. I will list just a hand full below along with a brief description, however please take the time and research each one individually as there are many intricacies too elaborate to mention here.
You will notice that kerning, a product only produced by modern computers and not typewriters is occurring. Kerning is the process where two letters share the same space so it’s more appeasing to the eye. Using a typewriter, this does not happen as each character is limited by the space
The document was provided on the White House website in a PDF format. This document when put through a Adobe imaging software displays the multiple layers, to the point where almost every item is on a layer. OCR scanners can separate scanned documents into layers, but not more than two or perhaps three layers. This PDF has many more than that showing that manipulation has occurred through the use of Photoshop. Further when analyzing the properties of the document, we can even determine that it was finalized on a Mac computer.
If the document was done on a typewriter, you would not have multiple typefaces. I would imagine there is the possibility that they could have use two typewriters at most. However, when looking at the letter ‘t’ throughout the document for example, you see up to 9 fonts! Logically this document would not have been written on the many typewriters to do this.
The image that was supposedly scanned shows that the page is in a bounded book, hence a gutter. This is the technical term referencing the dip on the left side of the document. Logically the text slants on the left of the document into the gutter. However, this only holds true for the text on the actual form and not the text that was supposedly typed. What we see is that the text that was supposedly inserted via a typewriter is horizontal throughout.
Using digital you can duplicate images exactly to the pixel whereas with analog every keystroke or character of a sort is unique. The odds for this to occur even once are in the millions, yet we see at least 25 instances where two or more letters match pixel for pixel. I will provide two examples with one to reflect a word and the other an image. The word “OBAMA” in field 1c and in field 8 both have matching a ‘B’. The second example is In field 4, the first two check boxes match.
Other areas in which you can research are that there are binary and grayscale letters which would more than likely stem from different the overlays of a higher resolution than the background meaning it was not original. There are white halos around all the type on the form.
The next set of following examples of a forged document relate to the information therein contained.
To have a stamp that is misspelled doesn’t occur often, and if noticed then one would replace it. Yet we see on this document that the stamp at the bottom of the document has a misspelled word ‘THE’ in which it looks like ‘TXE’. Out of all the thousands of LFBC with the stamp, this is the only one that has that unique flaw.
You will notice that this document does not have an actual seal, and according to Hawaii law would mean that it is not a certified copy. While we’re on the topic of missing items, where is the footprint, weight and length of the baby?
Barack has stated that his father was from Kenya, which is reflected as such on the LFBC, however in 1961 it was called the East Africa Protectorate. Only after 1963 had the country adopted the name Kenya. Additionally it states his father’s race is African, but by federal statute it should have said Negro. His mother was listed as Caucasian and not ‘North American’.
The registration number is out of sequence as it’s suppose to be incremental to be consistent with other birth certificates before and after. We can determine this by reviewing the numbers assigned to the Nordyke twins, who were born at Kapiolani Hospital on August 5, 1961. Obama, who was born the day before the twins, has a document with the Certificate number that is higher, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, on Aug. 8, 1961.
Obama has spent two million plus fighting claims against him regarding the birth certificate issue and has gone so far as to move the lawyer covering the issue into the white house. As Shakespeare would have said, thou doth protest too much. With the arguments listed above I can certainly see why.