My final issues that I will be covering surrounding Barack Obama’s presidency will be the concept of a statutory citizen versus natural citizen. Assuming that everything I have stated in my previous writings was false, and the notion that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, the constitution of the United States still negates him from being eligible for presidency.
Presidential Qualifications Clause of Article II Section 1 Paragraph 5 of the United States Constitution requires that to be the President of the United States, a person must be born in the United States of two parents who are citizens of the United States or better understood as a second generation or later citizen.
If Obama Jr. was born in Hawaii to the parents he claims, with his father being a British/Kenyan subject (citizen), then he would be a statutory citizen. And a statutory citizen is disqualified for the Presidency.
When Barack Obama Jr. was born, Kenya was a British colony and still part of the United Kingdom’s empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948.
By both British Law and Natural Law, Obama was born a British subject, and is therefore not a natural born citizen of the United States. This is further covered by the 14th Amendment in which it states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside”.
The amendment was prepared and placed by John Jay who was the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was noted for writing the treaty ending the war of 1812, which was about American citizenship versus British subjects. This treaty made it clear that unless you were protected by the grandfather clause of Article II Section 1 of the constitution, that if you were ever a British subject (specifically British) after the United States was born you could NEVER be a natural born citizen.